Slop TVNewsLatest
News

Higgsfield and Luma tie clip cost to how many tries it takes

Both vendors' own tables price a month of usable clips at two attempts each, and both say the retry count moves the bill more than the per-second rate.

Illustration: Higgsfield and Luma tie clip cost to how many tries it takes
Illustration: SLOP TV News. Logos are trademarks of their owners.

Key takeaways

  • Higgsfield's October 13 cost guide prices 300 usable 8-second clips a month at $403.20 on its own API at $0.084 a second, assuming two attempts per usable clip.
  • Luma's October 14 cost guide lists Ray 3.2 five-second Draft generations at 20 credits, about $0.012 a second, a figure it calculates from full credit use on its $30 Plus plan.
  • Higgsfield's own break-even table puts an Ultra plan at $129 against $67.20 of API spend at 50 clips a month, then the API ahead at 300 clips, $403.20 against $1,075.

Higgsfield published a cost guide on October 13, 2026, and Luma published a run of comparison posts on October 14, and both reach the same point: what a usable clip costs depends on how many generations each keeper takes, not the rate per second.

Higgsfield, which sells an AI-native creative suite with more than 35 models and a separate API, built its case in AI Video API Pricing vs Subscriptions in 2026 around one workload: 300 usable 8-second clips a month at 720p, at two generations per usable clip. That is 600 generations and 4,800 seconds of output. Its table prices those 4,800 seconds at rates it says come from each provider's own pricing page:

Provider Model Rate 4,800 seconds
Higgsfield API Kling 3.0 Standard, 720p $0.084 a second $403.20
Runway API Gen-4 Turbo, 720p $0.05 a second $240.00
Runway API Gen-4.5, 720p $0.12 a second $576.00
Google Gemini API Veo 3.1 Fast, 720p $0.10 a second $480.00
Google Gemini API Veo 3.1, 720p $0.40 a second $1,920.00
Luma API Ray3.2, 720p $0.90 per 10-second generation, billed in 5-second blocks $540.00

Four rows match the vendors' own pages. Runway's pricing page lists gen4_turbo at 5 credits a second and gen4.5 at 12, at $0.01 a credit. Google's Gemini API pricing page lists Veo 3.1 Standard with audio at $0.40 a second and Veo 3.1 Fast at $0.10 at 720p.

Where the retry rate decides

Higgsfield's own break-even table keeps the same workload and moves the volume, which is where a subscription and an API swap places:

Usable clips a month Generations API at $0.084 a second Plan that covers it Subscription cost
50 100 $67.20 Ultra, 3,000 credits $129 a month
150 300 $201.60 Ultra, 6,000 credits $250 a month
300 600 $403.20 Scale, 5 seats $1,075 a month
1,000 2,000 $1,344.00 Scale, 13 seats $2,795 a month

The subscription wins at low volume, Higgsfield argues, because the same credits also pay for website work, so a batch that fits inside the allowance adds no cash. From 300 clips the API is cheaper on price alone in its table, and adds concurrency and a per-request cost estimate. Higgsfield prices a Kling 3.0 8-second clip at $1.20 on Starter ($15 for 200 credits), $0.78 on Plus ($49 for 1,000) and $0.69 on Ultra ($129 for 3,000), against $0.67 for the same clip on its API.

Luma makes the retry argument from the other end. Its October 14 post Cheapest AI Video Generators lists Ray 3.2 five-second Draft generations at 20 credits, about $0.012 a second at the assumed credit rate, and standard 720p SDR at about $0.06 a second. A note on the page states the $0.012 rate is calculated from its Plus subscription with full credit utilization, and that actual costs vary. Luma's plan page sells Plus at $30 a month for 10,000 credits and prices Ray3.2 720p at 100 credits for 5 seconds and 300 for 10.

Read these as vendor estimates. Higgsfield's table is Higgsfield's arithmetic on other companies' rates, Luma's figures are Luma's own credit math, and the guides do not share assumptions: one bills per second and another per 10-second block, one counts Draft-quality output and another does not, one refunds failed generations and another does not, and one prices in plan credits while another prices in cash. None of these is a market price, and none settles your own retry rate.

Both guides agree on the multiplier. Halve the attempts per keeper and most of these bills halve; double them and the gap between an API and a plan moves with your volume.

Both guides are free to read, and both rate tables are open: run your own attempt rate through either one before you pick a billing model.

Sources

  1. higgsfield.ai - Higgsfield's cost guide, its rate table, plan table and break-even table
  2. lumalabs.ai - Luma's Oct 14 cost guide, its $0.012 and $0.06 per-second figures and the credit assumption behind them
  3. lumalabs.ai - Luma plan prices and the Ray3.2 credits-per-clip table
  4. open.higgsfield.ai - Higgsfield API per-second list rates
  5. docs.dev.runwayml.com - Runway's own per-second credit rates for gen4_turbo and gen4.5
  6. ai.google.dev - Google's own per-second Veo 3.1 and Veo 3.1 Fast rates